Edition #2 — Week of September 4, 2026
The record year, Missouri's counterpunch, and the death of "mostly compliant"
Welcome back. This week the 2026 numbers arrived early: the midyear reports are in, one state's counter-sue law just switched on, and a French court said out loud what regulators have implied all year — a percentage score is not a defense. As always: real numbers, primary sources, one fix before the weekend.
The numbers that matter
ADA web lawsuits filed in July 2026 alone — on pace for a record year
of July defendants had a third-party accessibility widget installed when sued — up from 24.9% in 2025
of Q1 2026 web lawsuits hit Shopify stores — up from 33% a year earlier
A record year, with a new epicenter
UsableNet's 2026 midyear report (July 8) projects more than 6,000 digital accessibility lawsuits this year — an all-time high, roughly 20% above 2025 — with H1 the highest volume ever tracked. The geography is shifting underneath the numbers: Illinois has become the major new federal hotbed, filings are migrating from federal to state courts, and a single plaintiff firm — Equal Access Law Group of Illinois — is the biggest driver of the surge.
Their trends analysis adds the part most store owners don't see: about 80% of 2026 suits target e-commerce, the top ten plaintiff firms file ~84% of all cases — and businesses receive an estimated 2–3× more demand letters than filed lawsuits. The filings are the visible third of the iceberg.
Shopify's turn in the spotlight
EcomBack's Q1 2026 recap counted 1,037 web lawsuits (+5.5% year over year). Of those, 459 — 44.3% — targeted Shopify sites, up eleven points in twelve months. WordPress fell to 14.5%. Restaurants and food overtook fashion as the #1 industry (32% vs 25%), Illinois led all states with a quarter of all suits, and one firm (the same Equal Access Law Group) filed 28% of the quarter's cases. Also worth noting: 25.6% of sued sites had a widget running — the trap from Edition #1, now with 2026 data.
Missouri swings back — sort of
The genuinely in-week news: Missouri's SB 907, the "Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation," took effect August 28. Defendants there can now counter-sue plaintiffs and their attorneys to have suits declared "abusive" — with fee-shifting and punitive damages up to triple the fees — and the state AG can sue or intervene. The part that matters to you: a business that received written notice and started good-faith remediation gets a 90-day rebuttable presumption that the suit is abusive. Missouri was the #6 filing state in 2025, so other legislatures will be watching (Seyfarth's analysis).
Two honest caveats. Kansas passed a similar law in 2023 and it has produced zero known counter-suits. And "good-faith remediation" means documented effort — dates, diffs, records of what you fixed and when. If the law spreads, the paper trail becomes the product. (We sell the paper trail. But we'd tell you that.)
Europe: the end of "mostly compliant"
On June 4, a French court (Tribunal judiciaire de Caen) ordered Carrefour to make carrefour.fr and its mobile app fully accessible within six months — about December 4 — with a €500/day penalty for delay. Carrefour's defense was that it had reached 71% conformance with the RGAA/WCAG standard. The court rejected it: accessibility under the European Accessibility Act is an "obligation of result." The site cannot be a little accessible; it must be (ruling summary, tracked by Lainey Feingold's EAA tracker).
The first year of EAA enforcement everywhere else, per Allyant's year-one review: Sweden's regulator has 120+ complaints (mostly e-retail), the Netherlands is prioritizing audits of non-EU e-commerce sellers, and German law firms have started sending competitor-driven warning letters. No EAA fines anywhere yet — courts and complaints are moving first. And in Germany specifically, BIK auditors now reject overlays outright — a widget can disqualify your compliance file.
The quiet week in Washington
The DOJ's April extension of the Title II (state/local government) WCAG deadlines to April 2027/2028 is being challenged — the National Federation of the Blind sued in May to restore the original dates — and the DOJ's August regulatory agenda signals possible further softening. Lighter federal enforcement is exactly what plaintiff firms cite as the driver of the private-suit surge. If you sell to public-sector clients, build to the original timeline.
From the Phriday desk
Shipping week two: the subscriber dashboard went live (plan status, trial countdown, scan history, one-click report re-delivery), trials now require a business email so the free tier stays sustainable, and we're posting build-in-public on Bluesky at @phridaycloud.bsky.social. The Files itself grew up too — every edition now has a permanent archive page and an RSS feed.
One fix before the weekend
Missing alt text is the single most common failure in the lawsuits above. Give yourself
ten minutes: open your five highest-traffic pages, find the five most important images —
product shots, banners, category tiles — and describe what's in them, like you're
telling a friend on the phone. "Red canvas tote with leather straps, $48" beats "image of
product." Decorative spacer images get empty alt (alt="")
so screen readers skip them. Ten minutes, the #1 lawsuit trigger, real customers kept.
Sources: UsableNet ADA Lawsuit Tracker (July 2026), UsableNet 2026 Midyear Report & trends analysis; EcomBack Q1 2026 recap; Seyfarth ADA Title III (Missouri SB 907, NFB v. DOJ); Converge Accessibility legal update (Aug 2026); Auditsu & Lainey Feingold (Carrefour ruling, EAA tracker); Allyant EAA year-one review; Federal Register 2026-07663. UsableNet counts include state courts; Seyfarth's federal-only 2025 count is lower by methodology. Phriday Access provides monitoring and remediation guidance, not legal advice.
Know where you stand — free
A 10-issue scan of your store, plain-English report by email. 60 seconds.
Scan my site free →Phriday Access provides monitoring and remediation guidance, not legal advice. Next edition: Friday, September 11.