Launch film · 1 min 41 s · open-captioned

The Marker Case

A reenactment of a real, mid-level ADA web lawsuit. One customer, one cart, federal court. And it's not even the worst case of 2026.

Dramatization based on public court records. Captions on by default — an accessibility company's film ships accessible.

The case behind the film

Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLC, No. 17-cv-767 (E.D.N.Y.). Victor Andrews, a legally blind shopper in Brooklyn, tried to buy a marker case from a mid-size art-supply chain. His screen reader couldn't use the store, so he filed a federal class action under the ADA. In August 2017 the court found the site did not follow WCAG and was largely inaccessible to blind users; the court-approved settlement put Blick under a multi-year, court-supervised rebuild to WCAG 2.0 AA.

A mid-size retailer. One customer. Years in court. And in the time since, this kind of case went from news to routine:

432

ADA web lawsuits in August 2026 alone

31%

of them had a paid accessibility widget installed

5,006

federal suits in H1 2026 — worst half since 2021

95%

settle without a verdict — fees, then fixes

Sources: E.D.N.Y. court records (17-cv-767); UsableNet ADA lawsuit tracker (Aug 2026); Seyfarth 2026 midyear report; EcomBack 2025 annual report. Dramatization based on public court records; Phriday Access provides monitoring and remediation guidance, not legal advice.

Sixty seconds to know where you stand

The film's plaintiff found out in a courtroom. You can find out by email.

The lawsuit watchlist behind those numbers is The Phriday Files — free every Friday.